<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">

	<channel>
		<title>Owner Manuals &amp; Documentation</title>
		<link>http://mypowertrac.com/Forums/tabid/65/forumid/11/view/topics/Default.aspx</link>
		<description>Discuss these much-needed tools</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<generator>ActiveForums  3.5</generator>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006 by Simple trACtors, LLC</copyright>
		<webMaster>ptkent@mypowertrac.com</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>Categories to be used in FAQs</title>
			<description>  I think the next step should be starting to address the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Power Tracs.&amp;nbsp; Because of the number of FAQs, they need to be put into logical categories to make it easier to find the answer(s).&amp;nbsp; 
 What do you think would be the best categories to use?&amp;nbsp; </description>
			<link>http://mypowertrac.com/Forums/tabid/65/forumid/11/postid/75/view/topic/Default.aspx</link>
			<author>host</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 08:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Organizing the content</title>
			<description>    EDIT:  &amp;nbsp; I spit these replies out of the topic about gathering information for implements and put it here, since it applies to orginaizing the content of an entire owner's manual.&amp;nbsp; I think this  great discussion  better fits here.&amp;nbsp; It also allows me to experiment with another capability of this NICE forum software...     
 Kent 
 
 
Not sure if my thoughts would fit into this site well or not but I thought a good way to do one big PT manual that could work for all models and years would be to create a couple indexes that would drill down to informational pages that would be linked to from each model/year combo that it applied to.&amp;nbsp; Sound confusing?  &amp;nbsp;Let's see if I can "draw out" my idea.
  
 Start Page &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PT-180 Link &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PT-422 Link &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PT-425 Link &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; etc. 
 Each "Model Page" would have a Year List 
 PT-422 &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1994 Link &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1995 Link &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1996 Link &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; etc. 
 Then you'd get to the real "Manual Index" 
 Maintenance &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Schedule &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Greasing &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Zerk locations &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Modifications &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hydraulic Oil &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Oil Choices/Recommendations &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Filter Info &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;etc. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Engine &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Oil Choices/Recommendations &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Filter Info &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;etc. 
 All the "Manual Indexes" would look the same with dead links to begin with. If someone writes up a document about Zerk Locations for a 2002 PT-425 that index could point to the document.&amp;nbsp; If someone with a 1999 PT-422 could confirm that his&amp;nbsp;machine is&amp;nbsp;the same then that link could be turn on to point to the existing doc.&amp;nbsp; Then a 2005 PT-180 owner (that's me  ) might download the doc erase the three zerk locations that don't apply to it and upload the new doc with a request to update the 2005 PT-180&amp;nbsp;Zerk Location link&amp;nbsp;to point at the new doc. 
 With minimal work, some people contributing write ups others just confirming model/year info, we could have a very good manual in no time! 
 Bill</description>
			<link>http://mypowertrac.com/Forums/tabid/65/forumid/11/postid/34/view/topic/Default.aspx</link>
			<author>BCroasmun</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 17:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Using these forums to create documentation</title>
			<description>  I've looked closely at several software packages that allow groups of people to collaboratively create documents in an affordable, public Internet environment. Most have their limitations, as follows:  
 
 One of the most poplular, a Wiki, doesn't prevent one editor from overwriting another, i.e. the last guy there makes the change 
 &amp;nbsp;Those designed for Knowledge Bases or FAQs don't handle long documents nor photos very well at all. They're best used for simple Q &amp;amp; A formats&amp;nbsp; 
 We also need to be able to transition smoothly from "stand-alone" articles to larger chapters, and perhaps books.  
 With all that said, I've decided the most practical approach is through these forums and a flexible, collaborate content publishing toolset. These forums are currently set up to:  
 
 Allow registered users to upload up to three separate 200kb .txt files, MS Word documents or PDF files to each topic. Reviews can be done via replying to a topic, or downloading a document, reviewing it in Word (don't forget to Track Changes) and then uploading it again.&amp;nbsp; 
 Each time a document is uploaded it creates and enforces a unique file name -- so that one version doesn't overwrite another -- all previous versions are maintained.   
 Once a document is drafted and reviewed, it will be categorized and published. The content publishing tool I'll be implementing allows:  
 
 Defining multiple authors (who'd be responsible for each section or subject) establishes workflow and approval before the new content "goes live." 
 Multiple categories and subcategories (tree structures) of information, such as News, Articles, FAQs, Reviews, etc. Within each of those broad categories, nested subcategories can be created. These categories can be subscribed to (much like the forums and topics here) so interested persons are notified of changes.&amp;nbsp; 
 All registered users can comment on any of the content that's published, in any category, so that they can critique it, correct any errors they may find in it, etc. This allows the primary author an avenue to obtain feedback on the content once it is published.&amp;nbsp; 
 This allows the most flexibility, since any content can be "highlighted" as the Latest News, calling attention to it, similar to how the latest photos are shown in the galleries...   
 Those are my initial thoughts on the best way to progress...   Any questions or comments on this approach?  </description>
			<link>http://mypowertrac.com/Forums/tabid/65/forumid/11/postid/5/view/topic/Default.aspx</link>
			<author>KentT</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 16:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel></rss>